Hows the graphical diffrence between the ...

Is it like the xbox and GC(barely noticible), or like the Xbox and the ps2(significant diffrence in textures and lighting) or like the gc and ps2(significant diffrence in lighting and color)Hows the graphical diffrence between the ...
Depends on the game. It's mainly like GC and Xbox but there's some really bad PS3 ports.Hows the graphical diffrence between the ...
There's barely any difference.
it shifts from game to game. just dont use any EA game as a example
There's no difference.
Right now it's the same. The 360 is still holding on but it has no more room for next-gen improvement, while the PS3 does. Soon as more intense games get released they will either release only for PS3 or the 360 version will have to be dumbed down a bit because of it's older hardware. The cell engine is a hard bug to code for but the dev's are getting better at it. The 360 has little to no more room left for improvement, graphics wise. So don't be surprised if the PS3 will start dominating the market in a year or two, much like the PS2 did for so many years. (with 120 million units sold worldwide)
A good example is that Crysis is now in the making for the PS3 and the developers specifically said it won't be on the 360 for ''technical reasons''.
So the diffrence is minimal, not like the PS2 and the XBOX(which was quite large no matter haow you argue it)
[QUOTE=''HunidRacks'']Right now it's the same. The 360 is still holding on but it has no more room for next-gen improvement, while the PS3 does. Soon as more intense games get released they will either release only for PS3 or the 360 version will have to be dumbed down a bit because of it's older hardware. The cell engine is a hard bug to code for but the dev's are getting better at it. The 360 has little to no more room left for improvement, graphics wise. So don't be surprised if the PS3 will start dominating the market in a year or two, much like the PS2 did for so many years. (with 120 million units sold worldwide) [/QUOTE] Spread your cow BS elsewhere. A console doesn't reach its potential until its 4-5th year. I remember people saying the PS2 wouldn't produce better graphics than FFX(it took about 2yr to beat that graphical mark). Epic said they used only 30% of the 360 hardware when they made GOeW. And stop dreaming that the PS3 will magically outsell the wii(let alone the 360). It will take 2yrs to beat the 360 and by the time it starts getting any serious market position this gen will be over.ANd mark my words. sony will never again let MS lauch a console before them(they will try to rush the PS4 if they have to)
[QUOTE=''HunidRacks'']A good example is that Crysis is now in the making for the PS3 and the developers specifically said it won't be on the 360 for ''technical reasons''.[/QUOTE] As far as i know cryengine 2 is being made for both console not crysis i don't know where you get your info from.
if you're talking about exclusive games, then ps3 is better in term of graphicsif you're talking about multi-plat games, then there's no difference
[QUOTE=''bigevil_rashek''][QUOTE=''HunidRacks'']Right now it's the same. The 360 is still holding on but it has no more room for next-gen improvement, while the PS3 does. Soon as more intense games get released they will either release only for PS3 or the 360 version will have to be dumbed down a bit because of it's older hardware. The cell engine is a hard bug to code for but the dev's are getting better at it. The 360 has little to no more room left for improvement, graphics wise. So don't be surprised if the PS3 will start dominating the market in a year or two, much like the PS2 did for so many years. (with 120 million units sold worldwide) [/QUOTE] Spread your cow BS elsewhere. A console doesn't reach its potential until its 4-5th year. I remember people saying the PS2 wouldn't produce better graphics than FFX(it took about 2yr to beat that graphical mark). Epic said they used only 30% of the 360 hardware when they made GOeW. And stop dreaming that the PS3 will magically outsell the wii(let alone the 360). It will take 2yrs to beat the 360 and by the time it starts getting any serious market position this gen will be over.ANd mark my words. sony will never again let MS lauch a console before them(they will try to rush the PS4 if they have to)[/QUOTE]both of you spreading BS...
360 has slightly darker more realalistic graphics ps3 has lighter computer like graphics i would say go for the 360 lighing somtimes gets in the way of ps3 game although moveis are awsome
eh, it depends. IF we go by how the Exclusives look. Id say Ps3 looks better, but not by much.
Hardly any difference especially with multiplats. And to think a cheaper starting price console (360) can produce the same or even better textured graphics as with still the most expensive starting price console (PS3).
[QUOTE=''ReverseCycology''] Hardly any difference especially with multiplats. And to think a cheaper starting price console (360) can produce the same or even better textured graphics as with still the most expensive starting price console (PS3). [/QUOTE] wow, and here I thought you were going to make a non fanboyish post.
so far the majority of multiplats have been pretty much equal except the 360 version usually has slightly better lighting, AA, and framerate...
[QUOTE=''black_awpN1''][QUOTE=''ReverseCycology''] Hardly any difference especially with multiplats. And to think a cheaper starting price console (360) can produce the same or even better textured graphics as with still the most expensive starting price console (PS3). [/QUOTE] wow, and here I thought you were going to make a non fanboyish post. [/QUOTE] If the truth is fanboyish to you, then be it. *shrugs*
[QUOTE=''ReverseCycology'']Hardly any difference especially with multiplats. And to think a cheaper starting price console (360) can produce the same or even better textured graphics as with still the most expensive starting price console (PS3).[/QUOTE] If/when it works.
[QUOTE=''bigevil_rashek''] [QUOTE=''HunidRacks'']Right now it's the same. The 360 is still holding on but it has no more room for next-gen improvement, while the PS3 does. Soon as more intense games get released they will either release only for PS3 or the 360 version will have to be dumbed down a bit because of it's older hardware. The cell engine is a hard bug to code for but the dev's are getting better at it. The 360 has little to no more room left for improvement, graphics wise. So don't be surprised if the PS3 will start dominating the market in a year or two, much like the PS2 did for so many years. (with 120 million units sold worldwide) [/QUOTE] Spread your cow BS elsewhere. A console doesn't reach its potential until its 4-5th year. I remember people saying the PS2 wouldn't produce better graphics than FFX(it took about 2yr to beat that graphical mark). Epic said they used only 30% of the 360 hardware when they made GOeW. And stop dreaming that the PS3 will magically outsell the wii(let alone the 360). It will take 2yrs to beat the 360 and by the time it starts getting any serious market position this gen will be over.ANd mark my words. sony will never again let MS lauch a console before them(they will try to rush the PS4 if they have to)[/QUOTE] wtf, GeoW was definately pushing the Xbox hardware, 30% my ass :P